
Most vertical SaaS platforms have already understood that a payments strategy, specifically embedded payments, belong on the roadmap. But the harder part? Choosing a payments partner who can actually help drive revenue growth and scale their operations.
Our guide below covers it all. The economics behind embedded payments. What current market data says about timing. And a framework to help you confidently choose a payments partner you can grow with.
Run the numbers on a single customer, and the opportunity gets real fast. Take a SaaS platform built for home and field-services businesses like HVAC, plumbing, electrical, landscaping, or pest control. Here's what it's working with:
Do the math on seats alone: $89 per user × 8 users × 12 months = $8,544 per business a year.
Two ceilings cap that number, and both can be hard to move: how many service businesses the platform can win, and how many seats each one can buy.
Average annual revenue per business = $8,544
Total addressable market = $513M/yr
But revenue per customer is capped at whatever the platform charges for seats. And when a business stops hiring or churns to a competitor, that revenue goes with it.
Add embedded payments, and the math changes. Now the platform earns another 30–100 basis points on the card and ACH volume its service businesses already collect through the platform.
At 75 basis points on $1.1M in annual volume, that's another $8,250 in revenue from the same business, nearly matching what it earns from seats alone.
Average annual revenue per business = $16,794
Total addressable market grows to ~$1B/yr
The result is that this platform nearly doubles its revenue per customer without landing a single new account. All from volume that's already flowing through its own software.
The numbers compound fast once you spread them across a full book of business. In fact, SaaS platforms that layer in financial services see revenue per customer climb 2–5x.
How much of that ceiling a platform captures comes down to how it embeds payments.
The platforms that capture the most don't treat payments as a checkout add-on. They build payments into the core workflow like the schedule, the invoice, or the point of sale, so that processing volume grows automatically as merchants use the product. The revenue follows the usage, not a separate upsell.
The goal is to make payments the default path through a workflow merchants already run every day—and the partner you choose determines whether you hit it.
Your merchants are already moving more of their transactions into the software they use every day. Embedded payments are shifting from an optional add-on to the expectation for vertical SaaS platforms.
And embedded payments adoption is accelerating across exactly the segment most vertical platforms serve. More than half of relevant ISVs in North America offered embedded payments in 2025.
Merchants are actively migrating processing volume onto the software platforms they already use, so a platform without embedded payments is leaving that revenue on the table for a competitor to collect.
The same merchants increasingly expect processing and financial workflows to live directly inside the tools they run their business on. As that volume moves into platform-native workflows, software companies capture payment revenue directly, improve retention, and expand beyond seat-based pricing.
That opportunity is scaling fast:
Yes! But only if your core product is already embedded in your merchants' day-to-day workflows. Get the pricing structure right, and payments revenue compounds alongside SaaS revenue without undermining retention.
If your platform already runs scheduling, dispatch, invoicing, or customer records, payments are the next thing merchants naturally expect from it. And you don't need to discount payments to drive adoption.
The right embedded payments pricing model balances a few things:
Priced correctly, embedded payments lift revenue per user, improve gross margin, and create a recurring revenue stream tied directly to merchant transaction volume. Once you decide to monetize, the next question is which implementation model fits your platform. And which partner gets you there without months of build time.
Pick the wrong embedded payments partner, and you're looking at poor merchant experiences, lack of clarity of risk management, and compliance work that lands right back on your team.
Run any partner through these checks:
Rainforest is purpose-built for vertical SaaS platforms that want to own the payments experience, grow processing volume, and maximize payments revenue without the compliance headache. We give you full control of merchant onboarding, pricing, and reporting. You own the merchant relationship and the data. We handle the infrastructure, so you can grow your business.
The fastest path is partnering with a payments partner built for exactly this. This model gives you the economics and merchant experience of a full PayFac (branded onboarding, revenue share on processing volume, full control of the merchant relationship) without registering as a PayFac, building compliance infrastructure, or managing underwriting in-house. A purpose-built provider handles the regulatory and operational complexity. You just integrate through a single API. Most platforms launch faster this way than building from scratch or wrestling with a legacy provider that demands custom integration.
Chargeback liability depends on your implementation model. If you operate as a full PayFac, your platform owns the liability directly. With a payments partner model, merchants still generally own their own chargebacks, though the right partner might reduce how often they happen. Rainforest offers 3DS, which shifts liability for many fraud-related chargebacks to the card issuer and has cut fraud-driven chargebacks by 90%+ for some merchants.
Since Rainforest is responsible for merchant underwriting, we also absorb merchant credit losses. Confirm liability terms, reserve requirements, and dispute workflows before signing, since "the provider handles it" means very different things depending on who you ask.
Payout architecture for multi-location and franchise models depends heavily on the provider, so ask specifically. The best providers support flexible payout structures that route funds to a parent entity, individual locations, or a combination, depending on how your customers are organized. Look for split payouts, configurable settlement timing, and location-level reporting so your merchants have visibility into their own revenue. If your platform serves franchisors or multi-unit operators, confirm that the provider's onboarding flow can handle multiple sub-merchant accounts under a single parent relationship without separate integrations for each location.
Rainforest is purpose-built for vertical SaaS platforms that want to launch embedded payments without building compliance, underwriting, or payments infrastructure in-house.
We handle merchant onboarding, KYC/KYB, PCI Level 1 compliance, fraud monitoring, chargeback management, and deposits, all through a single API. Your team focuses on product adoption and revenue growth. We focus on the payments operations underneath it.
You keep full control of the merchant relationship, pricing, and customer experience while turning existing payment volume into a scalable new revenue stream.
Be the first to hear about new content
